- 128
- 76
I'm not quite sure what to make of this.
www.independent.co.uk
According to The Wall Street Journal, Trump has repeatedly promised pardons to administration officials on multiple occasions, including during one recent meeting at which he reportedly said he’d “pardon everyone who has come within 200 feet of the Oval” before he leaves office in January 2029.
The Journal also reported that he’d had a separate conversation with aides in his private dining room during which he’d mused about holding a news conference to announce the mass pardons in the waning days of his administration.
So the Supreme Court has said the President is immune from the law for presidential duties.
They have explicity said that the president can command the armed forces to kill his political opponents.
Presidential pardons are a duty of the President, so it seems to me (not a legal scholar) that the president is free to take personal bribes/payment for pardons, he can also pardon people for committing crimes for himself. He has already done this with the pardoning of the Jan 6ers and of Michael Flynn, Robert Stone, Steve Bannon etc. He could hire a hitman to kill his wife and then he could pardon the hitman, as long as he was hiring the hitman as part of his presidential duties, (let's say he argued that his wife was distracting him from doing his presidential duties).
But now it seems Trump has declared to people under him that he WILL hand out pardons in his waning days of his presidency.
Why would he do this?
Is he worried that the Dems will fabricate some charges against his people, or his is he getting push back from people in his office when he is damanding they do illegal things?
Shouldn't this blanked pardon offer be enough to remove him from office (impeachment) if his intent is to get people to carry out high crimes and misdameanors on his behalf? Is he dong this now, before the mid terms because he wants his people to carry out illegal activity in order to keep control of the House and the Senate?
Now let's say Trump is a "good" and ethical guy, loves democracy and is straight and above board. So all this worry is for nothing.
Well, what if, in the future a crooked person is voted into office and gets his administration to do crimes to keep power and to corruptly use the office for personal enrichment. What legal or structural recourse does the USA experiment offer to stop a corrupt President, administration, party?
Trump promised mass pardons for his top aides before he leaves office: report
The White House has characterized his remarks as having been made in jest
The Journal also reported that he’d had a separate conversation with aides in his private dining room during which he’d mused about holding a news conference to announce the mass pardons in the waning days of his administration.
So the Supreme Court has said the President is immune from the law for presidential duties.
They have explicity said that the president can command the armed forces to kill his political opponents.
Presidential pardons are a duty of the President, so it seems to me (not a legal scholar) that the president is free to take personal bribes/payment for pardons, he can also pardon people for committing crimes for himself. He has already done this with the pardoning of the Jan 6ers and of Michael Flynn, Robert Stone, Steve Bannon etc. He could hire a hitman to kill his wife and then he could pardon the hitman, as long as he was hiring the hitman as part of his presidential duties, (let's say he argued that his wife was distracting him from doing his presidential duties).
But now it seems Trump has declared to people under him that he WILL hand out pardons in his waning days of his presidency.
Why would he do this?
Is he worried that the Dems will fabricate some charges against his people, or his is he getting push back from people in his office when he is damanding they do illegal things?
Shouldn't this blanked pardon offer be enough to remove him from office (impeachment) if his intent is to get people to carry out high crimes and misdameanors on his behalf? Is he dong this now, before the mid terms because he wants his people to carry out illegal activity in order to keep control of the House and the Senate?
Now let's say Trump is a "good" and ethical guy, loves democracy and is straight and above board. So all this worry is for nothing.
Well, what if, in the future a crooked person is voted into office and gets his administration to do crimes to keep power and to corruptly use the office for personal enrichment. What legal or structural recourse does the USA experiment offer to stop a corrupt President, administration, party?