What's new

An Analysis of More Fair Voting Systems

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gleem
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Derek Muller analyzes various democratic voting methods in his Veritassium video, questioning the effectiveness of the majority candidate wins system. A proposed solution includes a blind candidate voting system, where voters base their choices on candidates' voting records rather than their identities. The discussion emphasizes the importance of evaluating candidates based on their actions, not just their rhetoric, and suggests that qualifications for presidential candidates should include prior government experience.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of democratic voting systems
  • Familiarity with political qualifications and electoral processes
  • Knowledge of candidate evaluation methods
  • Awareness of the impact of voting records on public perception
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "blind candidate voting systems" and their implementation
  • Explore the historical context of voting qualifications in the U.S.
  • Investigate tools for tracking congressional voting records
  • Learn about alternative voting methods such as ranked-choice voting
USEFUL FOR

Political scientists, election reform advocates, voters seeking to make informed decisions, and anyone interested in improving democratic processes.

Messages
249
Reaction score
202
Derek Muller looks at different democratic voting methods compared to the widely used majority candidate wins in his Veritassium video to see which one reflects the majority choice more closely.
 
More fair?
This is 'grade school' logic.

I would develop a voting system based on a blind candidate system where voters don't see the candidates, but rather the way they voted.
 
The way they voted, how?
Given my ever increasing dementia, I would now recommend googling:

how did ted cruz vote on important issues over the last 10 years
and
how did jeff merkley vote on important issues over the last 10 years

and look at what AI has to say, and determine if that person shares your values.

In the olden days, there was a website that ranked the importance of bills voted upon by congresspeeps and you could quickly determine for yourself who was a bloviating gasbag and who was a person worthy of your vote. I can't seem to find the site at the moment.
 
So, how do you vote for someone like Trump with no voting record?
I was waiting for this question. I thought about it for a bit and decided that instead of a minimum age, we should have a minimum government experience qualification.

To be eligible to run for president, you have to meet one of the 3:
1. Been a governor of a state for at least 1 full term
2. Been a national level representative for at least 2 full terms
3. Been a national level senator for at least 1 full term

Hence, el doucho, would never have been elected, because he obviously wasn't qualified. I'm still curious what he's ever been qualified to do, other than point fingers and say; "YOU'RE FIRED!"
 

Liberal Democracy Values

  • Free and Fair Elections
  • Rule of Law
  • Separation of Powers & Checks and Balances
  • Protection of Civil Liberties and Human Rights
  • Pluralism & Political Competition
  • Independent Media & Free Press
  • Open Civil Society

Community Values

  • Civility
  • Productivity
  • Good Faith Debate
  • Evidence Based Debate
  • Transparency
  • Integrity

Community Motto

"It is the responsibility of intellectuals to speak the truth and expose lies." - Noam Chomsky
Back
Top