- Admin
- #1
Greg Bernhardt
Site Admin
- 478
- 305
How little we've advanced in 60 years. Worth a watch for today.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The discussion highlights the enduring relevance of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech and the Massey Lecture series he delivered in 1967. Participants reflect on the historical context of civil rights, referencing Rep. Thomas E. Miller's speeches from 1891, which address systemic racism and disenfranchisement faced by African Americans. The conversation underscores the regression in civil rights advancements over the past 60 years, particularly in the context of political representation and the ongoing struggle against lynching and voter suppression.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for historians, civil rights activists, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the historical struggles for racial equality and the ongoing challenges in political representation for African Americans.
The article featuring his speechs noted“I have been reminded that to make this speech may cost me my seat I shall not be muffled here. Muffled drums are instruments of the dead. I am in part the representative of the living; of those whose rights are denied; of those who are slandered by the press, on the lecture platform, in the halls of legislation, and oftentimes by men in the livery of heaven, and I deem it my supreme duty to raise my voice, though feebly, in their defense.”
It was the second—and last—speech Miller gave from the House floor as a member of Congress. He was one of the last five African American members of the House in the nineteenth century; no Black candidates would be elected to Congress from 1900 to 1928, and none from a Southern state until 1972. Miller ran in November 1888 in a Sumter County district that was more than 80% African American—gerrymandered to contain (and control) most of the region’s Black population. His opponent was the white Democratic incumbent, William Elliott, who claimed victory and was seated in the new Congress. Miller contested the election on the grounds that most Black voters had been prevented from casting ballots, and on September 23, 1890, with only a week remaining in the first session of the 51st Congress, the Republican-controlled House voted to seat him in Elliott’s place. For the remaining months of the term, he was the only Republican in the seven-member delegation from South Carolina.
He goes on to give specific instances of cruel treatment by the Democratic white population.Mr. MILLER. Mr. Chairman, it is late in the day and in the session, but some things are being said to which I should like to reply. To hold office is a precious gift, and the race to which I belong are desirous of it, but there are gifts superior to office. Gentlemen talk about the North and about its not giving negroes representation on their tickets. That is not the thing we are suffering most from in the South.
There are other things of more importance to us. First is the infernal lynch law. That is the thing we most complain of. It is a question whether when we go to work we will return or not. Second, they have little petty systems of justices who rob us of our daily toil, and we can not get redress before the higher tribunals. Third, we work for our task-masters, and they pay us if they please, for the courts are so constructed that negroes have no rights if those rights wind up in dollars and cents to be paid by the white task-masters. . . . Yes, gentlemen, we want office; but the first and dearest rights the negro of the South wants are the right to pay for his labor, his right of trial by jury, his right to his home, his right to know that the man who lynches him will not the next day be elected by the State to a high and honorable trust; his right to know that murderers shall be convicted and not be elected to high office, and sent abroad in the land as grand representatives of the toiling and deserving people. . . .