What's new

The Continuing Assault Against the 1st Amendment

  • Context: Law 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gleem
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of a letter from the District of Columbia attorney to Georgetown University regarding the cessation of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs, which raises First Amendment concerns. The conversation references the Supreme Court case West Virginia v. Barnette (1943), which upheld individual rights against governmental coercion in matters of opinion. The dialogue highlights the tension between governmental authority and constitutional freedoms, drawing parallels to historical events such as the German Enabling Act of 1933 and recent actions by the Trump administration against Harvard University. The outcome indicates a growing resistance from educational institutions against perceived governmental overreach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of First Amendment rights
  • Familiarity with Supreme Court cases, particularly West Virginia v. Barnette
  • Knowledge of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs
  • Awareness of historical legislative acts, such as the German Enabling Act of 1933
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the First Amendment on educational institutions
  • Study the details and impact of West Virginia v. Barnette
  • Examine current trends in DEI program implementation and challenges
  • Investigate the historical context and consequences of the German Enabling Act of 1933
USEFUL FOR

Legal scholars, educators, policymakers, and individuals interested in First Amendment rights and the intersection of government authority and educational freedom.

Messages
249
Reaction score
202
An attorney for the District of Columbia wrote a letter to the dean of the school of law at Georgetown University, a Catholic university to honor the execture order to cease programs that inclued DEI subjects. How over the top can you get in trying to intimidate private and relgiious institution from teaching their valules. Not only is this against the Constition but also a SCOTUS decision.
In a 1943 case called West Virginia v. Barnette, the Supreme Court upheld the right of two sisters who were Jehovah’s Witnesses to refuse to salute the flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance at school. In defending their liberty, the court wrote, “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.” . . . “But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom.”
Note this occurred during a war which most Americans supported.
 
I once read the comment: "Breach the constitution as often as you like but do not park next to a hydrant."

He wanted to say that the constitution isn't - how to say "strafbewehrt" in English - protected by criminal penalties. I am reminded far too often of the German Enabling Act of 1933 these days.

I hold my breath whenever something new comes from that administration.
 
Last edited:
In 1933, FDR was given carte blanche by Congress to solve the problems of the great depression. By and large this power was used for the betterment of the suffering population.
 
Whoops, picked a fight with someone big enough to defend themselves. Hopefully Harvard starts pushing its alumni to fight back as well. I haven't liked how some law firms are capitulating and providing extorted resources. Maybe they can take something from Trump's playbook and just not follow through on their promises.
 
Whoops, picked a fight with someone big enough to defend themselves. Hopefully Harvard starts pushing its alumni to fight back as well.
Donations increased after Harvard told the Feds to go pound sand.

 
I didn't follow through but I did look up ways to donate to Harvard. Not surprising to me that many did follow through and donate.
 

Liberal Democracy Values

  • Free and Fair Elections
  • Rule of Law
  • Separation of Powers & Checks and Balances
  • Protection of Civil Liberties and Human Rights
  • Pluralism & Political Competition
  • Independent Media & Free Press
  • Open Civil Society

Community Values

  • Civility
  • Productivity
  • Good Faith Debate
  • Evidence Based Debate
  • Transparency
  • Integrity

Community Motto

"It is the responsibility of intellectuals to speak the truth and expose lies." - Noam Chomsky
Back
Top