What's new

Trump sues his own Justice Dept. for $230 million

  • Context: Law 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Borg
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Donald Trump has initiated a lawsuit against the Justice Department seeking $230 million in damages related to previous federal investigations, including the FBI's search of Mar-a-Lago and the inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 election. He claims the government owes him this amount due to alleged misconduct during his presidency, asserting that any payout decision would ultimately be made by him. The discussion highlights concerns over the implications of such actions on democracy and accountability, drawing parallels to historical figures and expressing frustration over perceived failures in holding Trump accountable for his actions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of U.S. federal legal processes
  • Familiarity with the implications of presidential authority
  • Knowledge of the Mueller report and its findings
  • Awareness of the political landscape surrounding Trump's presidency
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the legal framework surrounding presidential lawsuits against federal agencies
  • Examine the implications of the Mueller report on subsequent political actions
  • Investigate the role of the Justice Department in presidential accountability
  • Analyze historical parallels between Trump and past political leaders in similar situations
USEFUL FOR

Political analysts, legal scholars, historians, and anyone interested in the intersection of law and politics in the context of presidential actions and accountability.

Borg

Site Admin
Messages
243
Reaction score
254
So now that he has his minions in place, he's going to sue them for the previous procecutions. Of course, they'll roll over and hand him the cash. Every day, brings yet another crime against this country. I just want to curse 24/7. 🤬

 
Sadly, everything turns around this:
[...], right up until 49.8% of American voters decided to return him to the White House, [...]

That is the will of the majority of people to give power to someone knowing that "federal officials pursued cases of alleged misconduct against a then-former president. The evidence was serious enough that the then-former president faced two federal criminal indictments and was charged with several felonies."

While the democracy is working perfectly well, it doesn't mean the People make the best decisions. Donald Trump did not take the power; it was given to him.
 
Sadly, everything turns around this:


That is the will of the majority of people to give power to someone knowing that "federal officials pursued cases of alleged misconduct against a then-former president. The evidence was serious enough that the then-former president faced two federal criminal indictments and was charged with several felonies."

While the democracy is working perfectly well, it doesn't mean the People make the best decisions. Donald Trump did not take the power; it was given to him.

Same as Hitler.
 
I don't see anything suspicious at all in demanding a payout from an agency that reports to the President, staffed by people he appointed who were his private lawyers that serve at his discretion and can be fired on his whim.

EDIT:

At least he explicitly states that he has final authority over the decision to pay himself $230M of taxpayer funds:


Donald Trump declared himself the arbiter of whether or not his own administration should pay him damages over past federal investigations, telling reporters that any such decision ā€œwould have to go across my deskā€.

The president insisted on Tuesday that the government owes him ā€œa lot of moneyā€ for previous justice department investigations into his conduct, while at the same time asserting his personal authority over any potential payout.

ā€œIt’s interesting, ’cause I’m the one that makes the decision, right?ā€ Trump said at the White House, responding to questions about administrative claims he filed seeking roughly $230m related to the FBI’s search of Mar-a-Lago and the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. The New York Times had reported the claims on Tuesday.
 
Last edited:
I just want to curse 24/7.
Same here. It's just so frustrating to be reminded of all the missed opportunities to stop this criminal. Democrats did nothing with the findings of the Mueller report. McConnell and other senate Republicans refusing to convict Trump after the insurrection. The Biden administration ignoring Trump because they thought he was politically dead. AG Garland focusing on the people who attacked the capitol instead of on the leaders who incited it. Biden deciding to run for reelection despite polls showing he was deeply unpopular. It's just failure after failure after failure.

One can hope that if sane people regain control of the federal government, they'll hold the criminals in the administration responsible, but experience suggests we should not hold are breaths.
 

Liberal Democracy Values

  • Free and Fair Elections
  • Rule of Law
  • Separation of Powers & Checks and Balances
  • Protection of Civil Liberties and Human Rights
  • Pluralism & Political Competition
  • Independent Media & Free Press
  • Open Civil Society

Community Values

  • Civility
  • Productivity
  • Good Faith Debate
  • Evidence Based Debate
  • Transparency
  • Integrity

Community Motto

"It is the responsibility of intellectuals to speak the truth and expose lies." - Noam Chomsky
Back
Top