What's new

Where do you get your news?

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Grinkle
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on various methods of consuming news, highlighting the use of apps such as WSJ, Bloomberg, Washington Post, and MarketWatch for timely updates. Participants emphasize the importance of notifications for free accounts and the utility of Google News as an aggregator. The conversation also introduces AllSides as a tool for comparing different media perspectives on the same story. Users express a preference for reputable sources like BBC and Al Jazeera for international news, while acknowledging the challenges of discerning truth in media reporting.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with news aggregation tools like Google News
  • Understanding of media bias and source comparison techniques
  • Knowledge of reputable news sources such as BBC, Al Jazeera, and The Guardian
  • Basic awareness of RSS feeds and their applications in news consumption
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the AllSides platform for media bias analysis
  • Learn about effective use of Google News for personalized news feeds
  • Research the impact of media bias on public perception and opinion
  • Investigate the functionality of RSS feeds and how to set them up for news tracking
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for news consumers, media analysts, and anyone interested in understanding diverse perspectives in news reporting. It is particularly relevant for individuals seeking to navigate media bias and enhance their news consumption strategies.

Grinkle

Moderator
Diamond Member
Messages
517
Reaction score
292
How I get my news -

On my phone, I installed apps for WSJ, Bloomberg, Washington Post and MarketWatch. That's already more than I have bandwidth to follow up on, its not like those are the only worthwhile sources or even the most worthwhile sources, they are just where I landed over time.

I don't have paid subscriptions for all of them, if you turn on notifications you get headlines even with a free account. If I see a headline that looks worth knowing more about, I Google it.

I'm not completely satisfied with the coverage I am getting (meaning I do miss some things I wish these sources had covered) but overall its a time effective way to mostly stay current and not have to parse through a lot of spin to get to substance.
 
I often read the news ticker on news channels to get an overview. I turned away from regular news channels since I can barely stand reading about, and even less hearing Trump. If I want to know details, I use Google News to find a reputable source, say, I do not read everything they offer me, only serious newspapers like NYT or German equivalents. I used to read FT for a while.

My sister consumes FOX. That is by far the bigger problem. Have you ever fought propaganda?
 
How I get my news -

On my phone, I installed apps for WSJ, Bloomberg, Washington Post and MarketWatch. That's already more than I have bandwidth to follow up on, its not like those are the only worthwhile sources or even the most worthwhile sources, they are just where I landed over time.

I don't have paid subscriptions for all of them, if you turn on notifications you get headlines even with a free account. If I see a headline that looks worth knowing more about, I Google it.

I'm not completely satisfied with the coverage I am getting (meaning I do miss some things I wish these sources had covered) but overall its a time effective way to mostly stay current and not have to parse through a lot of spin to get to substance.
I use BBC and Al Jazeera for international perspective. Washington Post, Heather Cox Richardson and my local paper for everything else.
 
I stopped watching BBC when they used a video of German athletes to cover a doping story of Austrian athletes. Far too manipulative for my taste.
 
I use Google News for an overview, but for me in the UK, the BBC has always been a good starting point for responsible news reporting, although I get the feeling their scope and accuracy have both declined in recent years. And for analysis and opinions (which don't always align with my own or even with other opinions from the same source), I usually turn to The Guardian, partly simply because it doesn't use a paywall.

Of course, it's very difficult to be really sure about any news source. On the few occasions in the past where I have had direct knowledge of some newsworthy event, I've seen that simple facts always get at least a bit garbled, if not totally messed up. And headlines (presumably added later) are often misleading or confused. Even video clips can be misleading if taken out of context. So it's always better to treat it all as "evidence" rather than "truth".
 
I find more important to understand the source than choosing a "good" source.
If you know where they are coming from with the "news" you can qualify the data received.
If, for example, you compare the headlines presented by different sources for the same news you start understanding.
Personally I prefer news that come from people who's income does do not depend of the turning winds of advertising.
 
Can you share some sources?
https://www.rtve.es/
 

Liberal Democracy Values

  • Free and Fair Elections
  • Rule of Law
  • Separation of Powers & Checks and Balances
  • Protection of Civil Liberties and Human Rights
  • Pluralism & Political Competition
  • Independent Media & Free Press
  • Open Civil Society

Community Values

  • Civility
  • Productivity
  • Good Faith Debate
  • Evidence Based Debate
  • Transparency
  • Integrity

Community Motto

"It is the responsibility of intellectuals to speak the truth and expose lies." - Noam Chomsky
Back
Top